To sacrifice the future for a fleeting illusion of stability is not statesmanship; it is a stay of execution signed in the blood of our environment. Yet, to dismiss a hard-won economic recovery as a mere byproduct of environmental crime is more than just political cynicism; it is an intellectual fraud of the highest order.
The narrative currently taking root, that the Cedi’s recent resilience is the fruit of a poisoned chalice, is as dishonest as it is reductive. We are told that illegal mining was encouraged as a sacrifice at the altar of the exchange rate. However, if destruction were the primary engine of currency strength, the previous administration’s “Gold for Oil” scheme would not have ended in such a whimpering, inflationary failure.
The survival of a nation’s currency must not be a zero-sum game played against its survival as a habitable land. Let us be clear: the Cedi is not standing because our rivers are brown; it is standing because our economic logic is finally clear and the structural pillars of our house are being rebuilt.
Critics suggest a sinister correlation: that for the Bank of Ghana to win, the forest must lose. They ask if Goldbod exists merely to launder the proceeds of environmental crime. This is a false choice. To suggest that we cannot leverage our mineral sovereign wealth while simultaneously crushing illegal mining is to admit a total paralysis of the state.
Must we remain beggars sitting on a bench of gold? Justice and economics are not mutually exclusive; they are the twin pillars of a functional Republic. Using gold to back a currency is a hallmark of fiscal prudence, not a confession of environmental neglect.
A university don argued that nations without an ounce of gold have stabilised their currencies through discipline and production. And, so what? Does our possession of the resource suddenly render its use illegitimate because some nations without it have stabilized their currencies?
The “Gold for Oil” programme of the past was an attempt to bypass the market rather than master it. It was a barter system masquerading as innovation, failing because it refused to address the underlying scarcity of value.
Unlike its predecessor, Goldbod seeks to formalise the informal. It is not an invitation to pollute; it is a mechanism to ensure that the wealth of the land, mined through legitimate, regulated small-scale channels, stays within our sovereign reserves. Is it illegal to be a small-scale miner? No. Is it illegal for a state to buy its own gold? Certainly not.
To conflate the two is to argue that we should remain poor simply because we haven’t yet mastered the art of policing our borders. The truth is found not in the depths of a muddy pit, but in the fundamental laws of supply and demand.
The Cedi breathes because the insatiable thirst for the Dollar has been quenched by structural shifts, not just gold bars. The true victory lies in the shadows of the Tema Oil Refinery. For decades, the demand for Dollars to import refined fuel acted as a parasitic drain on our national reserves.
By revitalising TOR and streamlining its internal revenue, the current leadership has cut the umbilical cord of dependency. When TOR demands fewer Dollars, the Cedi finds its voice. This is the production-driven transformation promised years ago, finally being delivered by men who understand that a refinery is a fortress of currency stability.
The story of the Cedi is being told as a choice between a clean river and a strong wallet. This is a false juxtaposition. The John Mahama administration has demonstrated, within a mere twelve months, that it possesses the technical hands to navigate this storm.
We see a Ministry of Finance that no longer gambles with our future and a Bank of Ghana that prioritises reserves over rhetoric. While the shadows of transparency must always be chased away by the light of public accountability, the first year has been an undeniable pivot toward dignity.
A nation that exports its raw potential and imports its finished survival is a nation that has chosen to be a tenant in its own home. We must refuse the cynicism that says we can only have a strong currency if we have a dead forest. We can protect our water and our purse simultaneously.
The architects of this recovery at TOR, Goldbod, and the Bank of Ghana deserve our commendation, not our suspicion. They have shown that when the state stops reacting and starts rebuilding, the Cedi does not just survive; it commands respect. The Cedi is back. Now, let us ensure the rivers follow.
By Raymond Ablorh
